Dependency Relations

Core Arguments

Thirteen dependency relations mark the core arguments. These are the parts of a sentence that a verb or a preposition requires: who did it, what it was done to, or what the subject is. Remove one and the sentence usually feels unfinished; remove a modifier and it only loses detail.

What you’ll learn

  • Use the deletion test to tell a core argument from a modifier
  • Tell the subject relations (nsubj, nsubjpass, csubj) from the object relations (dobj, dative)
  • Choose between attr, acomp and oprd for a complement
  • Label a recipient: dative before the direct object, pobj after to
  • Tell ccomp from xcomp by asking whether the inner clause has its own subject
  • Tell pobj from pcomp, and find the agent in a passive sentence

Required or optional: the deletion test

The quickest check is the deletion test. Marta repaired the radio quietly still works without quietly: it just tells you less. Without the radio, it does not work: Marta repaired sounds unfinished. So quietly is a modifier, and the radio is a core argument.

The test is a guide, not a rule. Some verbs can drop their object: She paints. Other members of this family can often be left out too, such as the recipient (dative) and the by phrase that names the doer in a passive sentence (agent on by, pobj on the doer): The waiter brought coffee. The mural was painted. They still count as core arguments because the verb implies them: bring implies someone who receives, and a passive verb implies someone who did the action.

All thirteen are drawn in the same colour: the colour names the relation family, and the label names the exact relation. So two arcs of this colour in one tree, such as nsubj and dobj, are two different relations from the same family.

Subjects

nsubj Nominal subject

A noun or pronoun acting as the subject of a verb. Its head is the verb. It is usually the easiest relation to find in a tree: find the root first, then ask who or what is doing the action.

How the parser decides: the noun or pronoun that agrees with the verb. In a statement it comes before the verb. The label goes on the noun, never on the determiner in front of it.

“The lantern flickered twice.”

detnsubjROOTadvmodThelanternflickeredtwice
  • det Determiner
  • nsubj Nominal subject
  • ROOT Root of the sentence
  • advmod Adverbial modifier
A plain noun subject — 'lantern' is the nsubj of 'flickered', and 'The' hangs from 'lantern'

“She paints enormous murals.”

nsubjROOTamoddobjShepaintsenormousmurals
A pronoun subject takes the same label as a full noun phrase

A sentence can carry several. An embedded clause has a subject of its own, and it is also nsubj, but its head is the embedded verb, not the root.

“She hopes the rain stops.”

nsubjROOTdetnsubjccompShehopestherainstops
Two subjects: 'She' under 'hopes', 'rain' under 'stops'

nsubjpass Passive nominal subject

The subject of a passive verb — grammatically the subject, but semantically the thing the action happened to. The bridge did not rebuild anything.

How the parser decides: the subject of a verb that also has an auxpass child. The two labels come as a pair: if you find one, look for the other on the same verb.

“The bridge was rebuilt.”

detnsubjpassauxpassROOTThebridgewasrebuilt
  • det Determiner
  • nsubjpass Passive nominal subject
  • auxpass Passive auxiliary
  • ROOT Root of the sentence
The labels nsubjpass and auxpass come as a pair — 'was' is the passive auxiliary

“Our tickets were refunded quickly.”

possnsubjpassauxpassROOTadvmodOurticketswererefundedquickly
The pattern is unchanged by a possessive on the subject or an adverb on the verb

csubj Clausal subject

A whole clause serving as the subject. The label goes on the verb of that inner clause, which is what makes it look strange at first — the arc runs verb-to-verb.

How the parser decides: the root has no nominal subject of its own, and a subordinate verb occupies the slot where one would be. Rare in ordinary prose.

“Whoever wins gets the prize.”

nsubjcsubjROOTdetdobjWhoeverwinsgetstheprize
  • nsubj Nominal subject
  • csubj Clausal subject
  • ROOT Root of the sentence
  • det Determiner
  • dobj Direct object
The verb 'wins' is the csubj of 'gets'; 'Whoever' is the subject of 'wins'

“Whatever remains belongs to you.”

nsubjcsubjROOTpreppobjWhateverremainsbelongstoyou
The same shape — a clause, not a noun, filling the subject slot

Objects

dobj Direct object

The direct object: the thing the verb acts on. Its head is the verb, and unlike a subject it normally follows.

How the parser decides: a noun or pronoun after the verb, with no preposition in front of it, that is not the indirect object. When the verb has two objects, as in brought us coffee, the second one is the dobj.

“Marta repaired the radio.”

nsubjROOTdetdobjMartarepairedtheradio
  • nsubj Nominal subject
  • ROOT Root of the sentence
  • det Determiner
  • dobj Direct object
The simplest pattern: a subject, a verb and its direct object

“The waiter brought us coffee.”

detnsubjROOTdativedobjThewaiterbroughtuscoffee
Two objects — 'us' is the dative, 'coffee' the dobj. Order decides which is which

“The noise startled him.”

detnsubjROOTdobjThenoisestartledhim
A pronoun object is labelled exactly as a noun would be

dative Dative

The indirect object: the person or thing that receives something. It gets this label when it comes right after the verb, before the direct object, with no preposition in front of it.

How the parser decides: mostly by position. In gave Nora the keys, two nouns follow the verb, and the first one, Nora, is the dative.

“Rafael gave Nora the keys.”

nsubjROOTdativedetdobjRafaelgaveNorathekeys
  • nsubj Nominal subject
  • ROOT Root of the sentence
  • dative Dative
  • det Determiner
  • dobj Direct object
'Nora' is the dative because it comes before the direct object

“Rafael handed the keys to Nora.”

nsubjROOTdetdobjpreppobjRafaelhandedthekeystoNora
Same recipient, no dative — 'to' is a prep and 'Nora' is its pobj

Complements

Five labels compete for the slot after a verb, and choosing between them is the hardest part of this family. Ask these questions in order:

  1. Is it a whole clause, with a verb of its own? It is ccomp if the clause has its own subject (said the ferry sank), xcomp if it borrows the main subject (wants to learn).
  2. Does it rename or describe the subject? A noun is attr (was a stranger), an adjective acomp (felt slippery). After seem, appear and a few other verbs, this parser usually uses oprd for both.
  3. Does it rename or describe the direct object? It is usually oprd (elected him treasurer).

attr Attribute

A noun after a linking verb that renames the subject — the traditional predicate nominative. The winner and a stranger are the same person.

How the parser decides: a noun complement of a linking verb. The linking verb (here was) is the root, and the complement hangs from it. The parser never uses the separate cop label.

“The winner was a stranger.”

detnsubjROOTdetattrThewinnerwasastranger
  • det Determiner
  • nsubj Nominal subject
  • ROOT Root of the sentence
  • attr Attribute
The verb 'was' is the root; 'stranger' is its attr

“This is my final offer.”

nsubjROOTpossamodattrThisismyfinaloffer
Modifiers on the complement attach to it, not to the verb

acomp Adjectival complement

An adjective after a linking verb, describing the subject. It fills the same slot as attr; the difference is the part of speech of the complement.

How the parser decides: an adjectival complement of a verb. Comparatives behave identically to plain adjectives here.

“The pavement felt slippery.”

detnsubjROOTacompThepavementfeltslippery
  • det Determiner
  • nsubj Nominal subject
  • ROOT Root of the sentence
  • acomp Adjectival complement
The adjective 'slippery' describes 'pavement', so it is an acomp of 'felt'

“The room grew darker.”

detnsubjROOTacompTheroomgrewdarker
A comparative adjective is still an acomp

oprd Object predicate

An object predicate: a word describing the direct object rather than the subject. In elected him treasurer, treasurer is what him became.

How the parser decides: the label covers two different constructions. In one, the word follows a direct object and renames or describes it (elected him treasurer). In the other, there is no object at all: the word usually follows seem or appear and describes the subject (seems conclusive).

“The class elected him treasurer.”

detnsubjROOTdobjoprdTheclasselectedhimtreasurer
  • det Determiner
  • nsubj Nominal subject
  • ROOT Root of the sentence
  • dobj Direct object
  • oprd Object predicate
A true objective complement — 'treasurer' describes the dobj, 'him'

“The evidence seems conclusive.”

detnsubjROOToprdTheevidenceseemsconclusive
Same label, no object anywhere — 'conclusive' describes the subject

ccomp Clausal complement

A clausal complement with its own subject — a whole clause functioning as the object of a verb, often a verb of saying, thinking or asking.

How the parser decides: the complement clause has a subject that is not shared with the outer verb. This is the one distinction that separates it from xcomp.

“He said the ferry sank.”

nsubjROOTdetnsubjccompHesaidtheferrysank
  • nsubj Nominal subject
  • ROOT Root of the sentence
  • det Determiner
  • ccomp Clausal complement
The verb 'sank' is the ccomp of 'said', and it has its own subject, 'ferry'

“She asked whether anyone objected.”

nsubjROOTmarknsubjccompSheaskedwhetheranyoneobjected
An embedded question — 'whether' is a mark, 'objected' the ccomp

xcomp Open clausal complement

An open clausal complement — one whose subject is missing and understood to be the outer clause’s. In Ravi wants to learn, the learner is Ravi, but nothing in the inner clause says so.

How the parser decides: a complement clause with no subject of its own. “Open” means exactly that gap.

“Ravi wants to learn Portuguese.”

nsubjROOTauxxcompdobjRaviwantstolearnPortuguese
  • nsubj Nominal subject
  • ROOT Root of the sentence
  • aux Auxiliary
  • xcomp Open clausal complement
  • dobj Direct object
The verb 'learn' has no subject of its own — that is what makes it xcomp rather than ccomp

“He seems to understand.”

nsubjROOTauxxcompHeseemstounderstand
'He' is the subject of 'seems' in the tree, and the one who understands in meaning

So a to-infinitive is not always an xcomp. In Omar wants his sister to drive, sister is the nsubj of drive. The infinitive has its own subject, so drive is a ccomp. Spanish speakers often write Omar wants that his sister drives ✗, from quiere que su hermana maneje. That is not correct English: after want, English uses the person and then a to-infinitive.

“Omar wants his sister to drive.”

nsubjROOTpossnsubjauxccompOmarwantshissistertodrive
An infinitive with its own subject — 'sister' is the nsubj of 'drive', so 'drive' is a ccomp

Arguments of a preposition

pobj Object of preposition

The object of a preposition. Its head is always the preposition itself, never the verb or noun that the whole phrase modifies. That is why a prepositional phrase takes two arcs, not one.

The label sits on one word, the head noun: sofa, not the sofa. The phrase that word heads — it plus everything hanging below it — is what the Roles exercise boxes as the object of the preposition. The same holds for every relation on this page: nsubj marks keys, and the subject is The keys.

How the parser decides: the noun or pronoun that a prep introduces. It is one of the most common relations, and it always hangs from its preposition.

“The keys fell behind the sofa.”

detnsubjROOTprepdetpobjThekeysfellbehindthesofa
  • det Determiner
  • nsubj Nominal subject
  • ROOT Root of the sentence
  • prep Prepositional modifier
  • pobj Object of preposition
Two arcs: prep from 'fell' to 'behind', then pobj from 'behind' to 'sofa'

“The road to Cusco reopened.”

detnsubjpreppobjROOTTheroadtoCuscoreopened
The phrase modifies a noun this time, but the pobj, 'Cusco', still hangs from the preposition

pcomp Complement of preposition

What a preposition takes when its object is a verb form rather than a noun. Most often this is an -ing form, a gerund. It can also be the verb of a clause: in thought about what he said, said is the pcomp of about.

How the parser decides: the complement of a preposition is verbal. Compare insisted on the delay (pobj) with insisted on leaving (pcomp).

“She insisted on leaving early.”

nsubjROOTpreppcompadvmodSheinsistedonleavingearly
  • nsubj Nominal subject
  • ROOT Root of the sentence
  • prep Prepositional modifier
  • pcomp Complement of preposition
  • advmod Adverbial modifier
The word 'leaving' is a verb form, so it is a pcomp of 'on' rather than a pobj

“They apologised for arriving late.”

nsubjROOTpreppcompadvmodTheyapologisedforarrivinglate
The same shape under a different preposition

agent Agent (passive)

The word by in a passive sentence. It usually introduces the doer, the person or thing that performed the action. It is a preposition with a label of its own: agent sits on by itself, and the noun below it is an ordinary pobj.

How the parser decides: by attached to a passive verb, even when it does not name a doer. In The car was parked by the door, by names a place, but the verb is passive, so by is still the agent. After an active verb, a by that names a place is a plain prep: she waited by the door.

Every word that takes agent

  • by, and nothing else. The doer itself is the pobj under it.

“The mural was painted by students.”

detnsubjpassauxpassROOTagentpobjThemuralwaspaintedbystudents
  • det Determiner
  • nsubjpass Passive nominal subject
  • auxpass Passive auxiliary
  • ROOT Root of the sentence
  • agent Agent (passive)
  • pobj Object of preposition
The word 'by' is the agent; 'students' is its pobj. Note nsubjpass and auxpass alongside

“The letter was signed by the mayor.”

detnsubjpassauxpassROOTagentdetpobjTheletterwassignedbythemayor
  • det Determiner
  • nsubjpass Passive nominal subject
  • auxpass Passive auxiliary
  • ROOT Root of the sentence
  • agent Agent (passive)
  • pobj Object of preposition
A second passive — 'by' is agent, and 'mayor' hangs from it as pobj

Quick check

  1. Which word is the dative in Nina sent Omar a message? And what label does Omar get in Nina sent a message to Omar?
    Answer
    Omar is the dative in the first sentence: it receives something, and it comes right after the verb, before the direct object message. In the second sentence, Omar is the pobj of to, because a preposition now stands in front of it. The to itself is labelled dative here, as it nearly always is after send.
  2. Which label does the last word get in each sentence? (a) The bread tastes fresh. (b) Their coach became a referee. (c) We named the boat Esperanza. (d) The task seemed difficult.
    Answer
    (a) acomp: fresh is an adjective describing the subject. (b) attr: referee is a noun renaming the subject. (c) oprd: Esperanza renames the direct object, the boat. (d) oprd, not acomp: after seem and appear, this parser usually labels the complement oprd, even though there is no object.
  3. Is call a ccomp or an xcomp in Santiago expects to call? And in Santiago expects his brother to call?
    Answer
    In the first, call is an xcomp: it has no subject of its own, and the one who calls is Santiago, borrowed from the main clause. In the second, it is a ccomp. Here brother is the nsubj of call, so the inner clause has its own subject. Being a to-infinitive does not make it an xcomp.

Key terms

Core argument
Something a verb or preposition needs, not just allows. Deleting it usually breaks the sentence instead of shortening it. Diego owns a bicycle. — drop a bicycle and the sentence breaks. She became a pilot.

See: Grammar Basics

Complement
A word or clause completing the meaning of a verb. Five labels share the slot: attr, acomp, oprd and, for clauses, ccomp and xcomp. She became a pilot. — attr. The road was icy. — acomp.

See: Subjective Complements

Open clause
A subordinate clause with no subject of its own, borrowing one from the clause above. The reason xcomp is called an open clausal complement. She wants to leave. — she is understood as the one leaving. They began to sing.
Indirect object
The recipient. Labelled dative when it comes right after the verb, before the direct object. Rephrased with to, the recipient is a pobj, and to itself is labelled prep or dative. She handed Luis a postcard. — dative. She handed a postcard to Luis. — prep + pobj.

See: Indirect Objects & Complements

Practice on a real sentence

A long sentence with two objects after one verb. Find the root and its nsubj first. Then decide which noun after the verb is the recipient (dative) and which is the thing told (dobj): the recipient comes first. The words being interviewed describe one of those nouns, so they hang below it, not below the verb.

Loading the practice sentence…